Paul Thagard

View on Amazon

We’ve all heard about scientific revolutions, such as the change from the Ptolemaic geocentric universe to the Copernican heliocentric one. Such drastic changes are the meat-and-potatoes of historians of science and philosophers of science. But another perspective on them is from the point of view of cognition. For example, how do scientists come up with breakthroughs? What happens when a scientist confronts a new theory that conflicts with an established one? In what ways does her belief system change, and what factors can impede her acceptance of the new theory?

In his latest book, The Cognitive Science of Science (MIT Press, 2012), Paul Thagard considers the nature of science from this cognitive scientific perspective. Thagard, who is a professor of philosophy at the University of Waterloo, presents a comprehensive view of such aspects of scientific thinking as the process of discovery and creativity, the nature of change in scientific beliefs, and the role of emotions and values in these processes. He defends an explanatory coherence model of belief revision, proposes a model for explaining resistance to new scientific ideas, and even suggests why so much creative thinking goes on in the shower.

{ 0 comments }

Michael LynchIn Praise of Reason

April 27, 2012

Modern society seems in awe of the advances of science and technology.  We commonly praise innovations that enable us to live longer and more comfortable lives, we look forward to the release of new gadgets, we seek out new ways to employ technology in our everyday lives.  These developments depend upon a set of intellectual [...]

Read the full article →

Charlotte WittThe Metaphysics of Gender

April 15, 2012

Is your gender essential to who you are? If you were a man instead of a woman, or vice versa, would you be a different person?  In her new book The Metaphysics of Gender (Oxford University Press, 2011), Charlotte Witt found that most people answered that obviously they’d be different if their gender differed – even though [...]

Read the full article →

Karen StohrOn Manners

March 15, 2012

We rarely stop to notice that our everyday social interactions are governed by a highly complex system of rules.  Though often only implicit, there are rules governing how to board an elevator, how close one may stand to another when in conversation, when to bring a gift to a party, and how to maintain one’s [...]

Read the full article →

Uriah KriegelThe Sources of Intentionality

March 15, 2012

It’s standard in philosophy of mind to distinguish between two basic kinds of mental phenomena: intentional states, which are about or represent other items or themselves, such as beliefs about your mother’s new hairdo, and phenomenal states, such as feelings of pain or visual experiences of seeing red. It’s also hotly debated how to explain [...]

Read the full article →

Allen BuchananBetter than Human: The Promise and Perils of Enhancing Ourselves

March 1, 2012

Popular culture is replete with warnings about the dangers of technology.  One finds in recent films, literature, and music cautions about the myriad ways in which technology threatens our very humanity; most frequently, the lesson is that the attempt to harness technology for the betterment of the world always backfires.  It’s no wonder, then, that [...]

Read the full article →

Peter-Paul VerbeekMoralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things

February 15, 2012

“Guns don’t kill people; people do.” That’s a common refrain from the National Rifle Association, but it expresses a certain view of our relations to the things we make that also affects our thinking about the scope of ethics. On this traditional view, human persons are moral agents, and artifacts, or products of technology in [...]

Read the full article →

John ChristmanThe Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-historical Selves

February 1, 2012

In theorizing justice, equality, freedom, authority, and the like, political philosophers often rely tacitly upon particular conceptions of the self and individual autonomy.  Traditional forms of liberalism seem to assume a conception of the self according to which selves are self-interested rational choosers of their ends who are fundamentally asocial.  Longstanding critiques of liberalism contend [...]

Read the full article →

Crawford ElderFamiliar Objects and their Shadows

December 15, 2011

It might be a surprise to non-metaphysicians to discover the extent to which it is questionable whether the familiar objects we see and interact with – the dogs, trees, iPods, and so on – really exist. And yet, these familiar objects are actually very strange. For example, we take for granted that very same object [...]

Read the full article →

Robert AudiDemocratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State

December 1, 2011

In a liberal democratic society, individuals share political power as equals.  Consequently, liberal democratic governments must recognize each citizen as a political equal.  This requires, in part, that liberal democratic governments must seek to govern on the basis of reasons that all citizens could endorse.  However, the freedoms secured by liberal democratic institutions give rise [...]

Read the full article →